Virtual Paperboy
User login
Classified Ads
Recent comments
Other News Stories
-
by Kyra Hoggan on Jun 16 2013
-
by Michael Jessen on Jun 13 2013
-
by Christine Esovoloff on Jun 13 2013
-
by Kyra Hoggan on Jun 12 2013
-
by Amber Harper on Jun 12 2013
-
17 min 13 sec ago
-
2 days 11 hours ago
-
3 days 13 hours ago
-
4 days 6 min ago
-
1 week 1 day ago
Opinions
-
by Murray Dobbin on Tuesday Jun 18 2013 -
by Alex Atamanenko MP on Tuesday Jun 18 2013 -
by Miranda Holmes on Monday Jun 17 2013 -
by Katrine Conroy on Sunday Jun 16 2013 -
by Michael Jessen on Thursday Jun 13 2013
If you really know where to look behind the curtain, Germany has shown the world solar doesn't work, 102 countries now have solar grid parity? There are none, Hawaii with all its annual sunlight hours and high cost of imported energy for electricity cannot make grid parity. So much misinformation, solar electric has a long way to go before its affordable. Why this wasted money keeps being spent on unaffordable solar is astonishing. When technology catches up and solar is affordable, I am all for it, here in Nelson where the sun rarely shines, it will be a long long time before that makes any sense.
Ya the Good Ol' Days. Maybe it's time to kick start talks about putting a regional hospital in Castlegar . . . to serve the entire region?
Great article. There certainly is a lot of info floating around in the Rossland rumor mill. It seems to me that Red is trying to get the new chair installed this summer. The Summit Lift Company has set up shop in the lower lot and there is a brand new spool of cable, shipped from Switzerland sitting beside the dormant lift.
What is puzzling is that Red planned some kind of announcement for May 31, then retracted, and said to hang on a little longer. Officially they have already said the lift will be installed this summer in press releases (last fall) and in their seasons pass drive (in their newspaper ads they talked about the new terrain).
So what was the official announcement that was to take place on May 31st, and why was it delayed? Was the announcement for something else, such as expanded cat skiing? Perhaps they are trying to secure additional financing?
We won't know for sure until Red confirms their plans, but it would make sense for them to at least give some kind of update as to what is happening.
Remember the Good Ol' days? Before the IHA and their armies of administrators? When there was full time coverage in Kaslo and 24 hour 365 days a year internal medicine and surgery coverage in Nelson? And it was all less expensive than under the IHA's heavy administrative hand which has caused many physicians to leave the area.
The IHA is a waste of taxpayer dollars. No doubt the administrators all got big bonuses again this year. And oh ya remember before the IHA when our administrators didn't get bonuses?
Hi Ken
You know I value your input on this stuff. But I will rebut a couple of your points.
You argue that people should cut energy use because they want to, and not because they have access to taxpayer-funded subsidies. And you imply that a $1.6 million expenditure to save 1.4% of Rossland's greenhouse gas emissions is a bad investment of taxpayer dollars.
You know, because you and I have talked about this, that the final figures aren't out for the Energy Diet's first phase. So we don't know whether it really was $1.6 million invested and 340 tonnes saved. I'm skeptical, but let's assume for the sake of argument that those estimates are right.
The $1.6 million gets you a lot more than 340 tonnes. In terms of GHG emissions it gets you that much every year until the repairs fail or the house falls down. In terms of payback, if the investments are typical it will save homeowners enough in energy bills to pay off the investment in less than 10 years. In terms of local employment for contractors etc., well $1.6 million has huge impacts.
So the only question is: is it legitimate for the government to spend money on those things? Well, some of the money actually came from Fortis, not the government, and they have a legislated mandate to save power rather than build more costly new capacity, so that's a good use of ratepayer money. Some of it came from government, though. And yes, maybe you can argue that the government should not be paying to lower my power bill (though it should be paying to lower bills for low-income homeowners - a focus of the energy diet phase II). But can you argue that government has no business addressing climate change? Or addressing regional economic development?
When the final figures do come out we can have an informed discussion. But for now, at the level of principle, we disagree on your assessment of the energy diet.
BTW, I plead guilty on the "fattest energy town in BC" thing. But I don't think we ever said that, did we? Pretty sure that was a reporter's wording, though I could be wrong.
Cheers,
Aaron
As we know there are two sides to every story just as there is to an editorial but maybe some background information is required. The Chamber last week initiated a meeting with very short notice that I was unable to attend due to my father having the Honor of Citizen of the year bestowed on him the same evening. It is presumed that the reason for the meeting was due to some concerns being expressed by some members over the previous weeks.
Monday the following week this matter was brought forward for discussion at our council meeting. We were asked to make some kind of informed decision on what was an appropriate way to address these concerns over food trucks.
As the Chamber represents a very good cross section of our business community and does so very well, had prior discussions with local restaurants and also organized the original meeting with respect to food trucks. I for one felt it very important to actually hear their recommendation on topics like fees and distances between established restaurants and food trucks in general etc….. However that was not offered to us by the Chamber that evening. Without that information the concerns that were expressed at their meeting were not available to all of council.
I think it was prudent for Council to ask for the opinion of an organization that most likely represents a majority of our community businesses that would be impacted by food trucks. If in In fact you do a quick google search you would see many Chambers are spearheading the amendments to Municipal bylaws in taking on this food truck phenomenon going on throughout out the country.
As I mentioned more than once at our Council meeting the City cannot direct the Chamber to do anything but I would think they would want to make sure there members concerns were heard.
Council will ultimately vote on whether to amend our bylaws or not regardless of a Chamber position but I for one would value the input of the Chamber in making this as an informed decision as possible.
Whereas, a top level predator like a cougar represents a pinnacle accomplishment of intact ecosystems;
Therefore requires compensation offsetting the damage in removing a complex and valued animal from from this system;
In that, ecosystem damage is already measured and compensated through carbon offset funds; it follows that wildlife losses, from direct human intervention, are debts owing to carbon offsets.
Further a fee structure needs to be added, to every municipal carbon ledger, recording animal dispatches with rate according to species, age, gender and health of animal.
+++++++
Carbon Offset Bill
Regional District of Central Kootenay
May 2013
For, three young male cougars killed in Robson. $12,500/ea
Total bill $37,500 of Carbon Offsets,
Due in 2013 for this instance.
Adrian Dix was not the right leader for the NDP. He had very little in the way of compaign piz-zaz that a public leader desperately needs. The heading bobbing, swaggering gate that Dix put forth when stepping off a bus or walking onto a stage was a turn off to say the least. He was not a good speaker nor was he an in the trench warrior that is needed from a leader of a political party.
The Liberals were a dead horse by way of their history in this province. From the devistation done to the forest industry, to the pawning off the tax collection dirty work to the municipalities any other NDP leader could have buried Christy Clarke's, Liberals. Non of the above was mentioned throughout the entire election. The NDP campaign was soft and non-confratational right from the very beginning. Politics is a no holds barred competition where the winner takes all. Adrian Dix was not a slap back leader. A leader who demonstrates meekness will and did kill a political party.
Like her or not, Christy Clarke won every round throughout the campaign.
Here's a link to the back story on this. More to follow next week.
Murray makes some excellent points, but deep down inside he is still an NDP-er, and it clouds his judgement. This is the 5th election in a row which the NDP has lost, and they need to face the deeper truth: the days where the coalition of social progressives and unionists could win elections are gone. And no wonder, the party has not had a fresh idea since the days of Tommy Douglas, has no compelling vision for the future, is no more than a 'Liberal light' option for BC voters. But the arrogance of their supposed 'ownership' of progressive voters continues; the numerous attempts at cooperation by the Green Party waved away with disdain.
Perhaps after this devastating loss a little humility will creep past the armour of arrogance and union dollars. But I am not holding my breath. They didn't learn a thing from their previous 4 election losses, and most likely the roadblock to progressive government will just continue to do the only thing they do well: lose election after election after election.
I like roses and I would definitely plan to come to see this paradise of roses. It is really great good to see and know that the vegetables and roses are growing under the same roof.
colocation
I love the food at the Element and I also love the food at Twisted Thyme. I was so happy to have another choice in this town where the options of quality food is limited. The food truck offers something missing in Castlegar - quality food to go. The reason people are going to these food trucks is because it’s what people want. I feel that there is room for everyone in this town. Places like the Element need to focus on the experience of the ‘sit down’ meal – great service, beautiful décor, an alcoholic beverage and a meal so delectable that you wouldn’t dare rush through it. The Element and other businesses might be feeling some pain because people have had to compromise their true ‘wants’ for what is available. But I’m proud of our city for continuing to grow and being a more fun place to live. We can create street food culture in this town. It seems to me that we have already started! Castlegar needs to be a fun place to be to attract those tourists we so desperately want. Tourists may come and eat at the food trucks for lunch, but guess where they might go for dinner?
I would also like to point out that Twisted Thyme is owned by a resident of Castlegar and all of the employees live in Castlegar and surrounding areas as well. The food truck is not only allowing them to make a living, but contribute to the culture of our town. And I for one am thankful they are doing it because when I’m looking for food to go, I want quality and I want to support a business that helps my community. And when the ownership belongs to someone in my community and not to a chain, I’m doing just that.
The food truck industry is booming all over North America - even the Whitewater Ski Hill has a food truck serving their cuisine now. Perhaps the Element should open one up, travel around to surrounding communities and music festivals and promote our town and their wonderful establishment.
IT NEVER FAILS TO AMAZE ME THAT THE 99% HAVE A HATE FOR CORPORATIONS OR THE 1% AND YET DISPROVE IT BY PUTTING IN A GOVERNMENT FINANCED BY BIG CORPORATIONS!!!! TELL ME PLEASE WHERE ARE THE BRAINS OF THE 99% AT ELECTION TIME?
...That is not the question.
When asked about their fondest dream, how often will people (often yonger ones) quickly declare "Peace on Earth"... however they can't even make peace with their brother and sisters.
The statu quo... the way that the senate is used is not an option. It might be very useful to reform or even abolish the senate. However this is almost like the pie in the sky dream of peace on earth.
Practically we should look at what is the main goal of that institution: "A sober second thought".
This means that all the senators should be only senators. It is inconceavable that the senate would just be a pale copy of the house of commons with the grouping of the participants under the same political banners.
A Senator should be a totally impartial person whose judgement will not be tainted by a close association to any political party.
A Senator should not be allowed to participate in any overt political activity (fund raising, campaining).
A Senator should be focussing only on giving a "sober, impartial, fair, second thought".
The lack of total, primordial and blind commitment to the political views of any political party, might make it less probable that some decisions will be so devoid of common sense. That truth will be distorded to make it fit as neatly as possible with the views of a policitical party.
That a few senators abused the system with an unshakable sense of entitlement is not surprising. To have received their posting, most of the senators have the type of connections at the upper level that is a fertile ground for that sense of entitlement.
This is not the major issue. The major issue is the interpretation of the facts or distorsion of reality to prove their point of view. The political parties who are given these free munitions to annoy the currently guilty party, are much busier at making as much political mileage of the situation as to get at the source of the problem. And of course the guilty party will do anything to make the problem go away while providing as little ammunitions as possible to the other parties.
I have never eaten at the Element, and I likely never will, as well as 4 other Restaurants in town, sorry . . . not.
Mobile food servers service a clientele that will not affect the type of eatery as the Element, but likely effect the bottom line of places like A&W. I don't hear them whining. Mobile eateries are a historical part of Canada's Entrepreneurial small business scene.
I am a self employed small business/owner operator, and know how tough it is and can be, and I see the turn over of businesses in Castlegar, and how many empty retail spaces there are. Castlegar is a tough place to run a business.
People have a right to employ themselves, and in this area it is a necessary, and viable part of the business scene.
Is there a limit to how many restaurants in town, or is there a limit to how many tire stores in town . . . No.
I would also suggest looking at the mobile establishment, each is not a cheep endeavour, and it is not a case of simply applying for a health board approval and then receiving it.
If the food is no good, or unhealthy they will not last, and will they stay open in the winter . . . maybe not. This is a FREE ENTERPRISE country, and we should respect a persons right to earn a living, all be it legally.
I think food trucks are a great idea. On the odd occasion I bother going out to eat in Castlegar anymore I'm generally disappointed by the mediocrity of the food at most places - not to mention the fact that many of the menus are pretty much the same as they were 5, 10 years ago. If restaurants offered an exciting NEW summer menu, maybe the food trucks wouldn't be quite as appealing to people.
And even if they are, so what? Food trucks can allow greater flexibility and creativity in their food than a brick and mortar place often does. On the other hand, they have more limited supplies in stock and they have to make pretty much all of their money in the summer. Yes, I know those are the fat months, but still, a restaurant has an advantage there. If restaurants are losing business, it means they need to get more creative. Maybe Florio should get a food truck, too.
Come on, grow up, people. No one said owning a business is easy. You can't open a place, set a menu, then put your feet up until retirement. Things change and you need to change, too. Hey, maybe you just need an inventive taco menu.
With such a small voter turn out, which I understand to have been just over 50%, the win by Michelle Mungall of around 50% of those who voted means she had only about 25% of possible voters tick her box. That means 75% didn't vote for her.
It is a shame that so many people don't use their vote. It's a very sad comment on the state of politics today. Do about half the population have no trust in democracy? Or is it the style of politics that is at fault? I am sure the the ridiculous and frequently childish adversarial attitude often heard and seen in the legeslature and parliament does not help people respect those in office. Also the much demonstrated dishonesty surely can't help any political cause.
With STV dead and gone maybe reform of referendums might provide more depth to democracy and participation.
A tiny detail on the double majority, it is not 60%, it is "more than 50%". The real catch, however, is that this percentage is calculated on "the total number of registered voters in British Columbia", and the double majority aspect requires that "more than 50% of registered voters for each of at least 2/3 of the electoral districts in British Columbia" vote in favour of an initiative.
If that standard - more than 50% of registered voters for each of at least 2/3 of the electoral districts - were to be applied to form a majority government, we would never again see a majority government in this province.
That statute is a farce, a cynical and malicious one at that.
Andre, the goverment pulled a fast one on the "HST" referendum by ignoring the 60% double majority any government requires for a referendum.
STV was lost through by the misinformation campaign run by the "NO" side and Bill Tieleman. Tieleman convince everyone they couldn't understand arithmethic.
Tieleman is NDP progeny.
The only party that chose a position during STV were the Greens. Their endorsement probably didn't help: characterising STV as a fringe cause.
STV would was been a huge improvement. Sad.
Its the Albertans that have the worst driving attitude, they are very aggressive here in B.C., cause a lot of problems. They should stay in their own Province!
I have a picture that I took on Kirkup early May. It is a single set of ski tracks dissappearing towards the top of Kirkup. It is obvious from the tracks that there was about 50 cm of beautiful snow. When I looked back at the date of that picture I could see that I made those tracks in May.
Pitty that I can't attach it here
We had a chance at "a little propoertional representation" and the first time around a clear majority (not a first-past-the-post majority, but nearly 58% of the votes cast) was in support of it.
But the government, elected with 40-some percent of the popular vote, used its parliamentary majority to insist that, for referendum purposes, majority meant not 40% but 60%. So we did not get STV on the first crack. In its benevolence the government gave us a second shot at it and the second time around an overwhelming majority voted to maintain the status quo. And that's what we have today.
We could have changed it, but making a change would have meant trying something new, something different, and that would be ... un-Canadian?
I've got no love for the Liberals—zero—but the map's pretty clear that whoever it was who came out to the polls in BC's rural interior, with the exception of our pocket in the southeast, they were swinging hard for the Liberals. Big, fat, money-grubbing, resource-sucking, democracy-deaf red all over the place...
A little proportional representation would go a long way towards dealing with tiny margins that turn into hefty majorities, and it might inspire more people to vote too.
I'm surprised to see the math and learn that the margin was less than 5%.
What were they in 2009?
My own philosophy is that if the Liberals dont start to acknowledge rural BC, we need to stop sending them money.
To win with 50 seats and 30 of them within commute of Stanley Park tells the story. The rest of the province is beyond Hope.
Is it any wonder they don't hear us? They don't need us. We just don't matter.
Perhaps the Kootenays need to become the 11th province and the Northwest coast number 12.
They didn't close any hospitals in Surrey or Abbotsford.
Every time I go to see a doctor in Vancouver, it's like a $1000 tax for living where I do.