Anton 'the Inkfish' clouds Hydro losses from bad IPP deals
Yesterday morning, listening to Suzanne Anton, one of my co-panellists on Rick Cluff’s Early Edition political panel, avoid the issue of BC Hydro rates rising because of the scandalous sums they are forced to pay private power companies - and government avoidance of the BC Utilities Commission (BCUC) - fill the airwaves with hot air and non sequiturs, I called her an inkfish and was asked through emails to say what this meant.
Well, the inkfish is a species of octopus that has an ink sac, which can be used to expel a cloud of dark ink to confuse predators.
I was not, of course, saying that Ms. Anton’s verbal flatulence was literally an emission of dark ink but that the techniques are the same and clouding of the issues the same result.
The issues are not complicated:
- The Campbell/Clark government has forced, and continues to force BC Hydro to buy power from Independent Power Producers (IPPS) on a “take or pay” basis, meaning Hydro is spilling its reservoirs over their dams and paying several times the market value to IPPs. Literally, Hydro is spilling your Hydro rates over the dam in order to meet the “sweetheart” deals the Campbell/Clark government has forced them to sign.
- This has forced Hydro to incur huge debts that will be paid for by the only way they can be paid – by us as ratepayers or taxpayers, or both.
- Some three years ago, the BCUC determined these IPP deals were not in the interests of British Columbians. BCUC was, for its candour, stripped of its power to review BC Hydro rate increases unless directly asked by the government to do so.
- Scheduled BCUC hearings into Hydro’s proposed rate increases in consequence of these IPPs have been cancelled by Minister Rich Coleman, thus public scrutiny of this scandal won’t happen.
- The Minister and the Cabinet have rejected BC Hydro’s proposed 30% rate increase over 3 years and cut it to 17%. This is a purely political decision which is supposed to make us feel warm and fuzzy about Premier Clark.
- The fact is that BC Hydro’s proposed 30% hike would not, by a long shot, cover their escalating IPP-induced deficits. It is also a fact that you and I will cover these deficits either through increased rates or taxes, or both.
- BC Hydro has also set up special deferral accounts. As CTV reported, “the amount of debt that BC Hydro has deferred' into special accounts is expected to more than double to $4.5 billion in the next two years, the province has acknowledged.” Madam Inkfish would have us believe that this amount represents deferred capital expenditures, but this simply is not so and the Auditor-General has stated that this policy must end.
These deferred accounts are, for the most part, taking Hydro’s losses due to the IPP sweetheart deals, making them into a special account which they then say - because ratepayers now owe this money to BC Hydro - is now a Hydro asset! (By all means, read that again!!! Monty Python lives!)
Marjorie Griffin Cohen, a professor of political economy at Simon Fraser University, told CTV News that the BC Government is to blame for rising hydro costs because of a number of political directives it has handed down during the last decade.
Professor Griffin Cohen said, "The government has required BC Hydro to buy very expensive private electricity at a time when it basically doesn't need it. It has also introduced the smart meter program, which is very expensive." (Emphasis added)
Here we have it, once the ink has dissipated. Where BC Hydro once put hundreds of millions of dollars into the Provincial Treasury as a dividend for us the citizens, we are now on the hook for a minimum $4.5 Billion over the next two years by the government’s own admission - this increase being largely the Campbell/Clark “sweetheart” deals with corporate pals.
When Premier Clark and Minister Coleman say they are reducing BC Hydro’s proposed rate increase from 30% to 17%, that is a contemptible distortion of the truth. The fact is that BC Hydro’s deficits are our deficits and whether we pay them off by rate increases or tax increases is a purely political calculation. To say they cut Hydro’s demands is an election ploy which, even for this bunch, is remarkable dissembling.
Why is our healthcare, education funding and the like strapped for cash?
Ask Madam Inkfish and her clients that question.
Rafe Mair was a B.C. MLA 1975 to 1981, Minister of Environment from late 1978 through 1979. Since 1981 he has been a radio talk show host, and is recognized as one of B.C.'s pre-eminent journalists. This article originally appeared in the Common Sense Canadian.

Comments
Marjorie Cohen is a women's
Marjorie Cohen is a women's studies instructor at taxpayer supported SFU University. She thinks she knows the complexities of the power generation industries, but that does not stop her from making simplistic sermons on radical leftwing and marxist radio shows against clean and renewable power generation.
Her claim to fame is her appointment by Glenn Clark, of a feminist with ZERO technical, engineering, scientific, economic, or policy knowledge to the Board of BC Hydro, which netted her a huge sum of money, and which she drove the company into the ground.
This political appointment was cancelled as soon as the NDP was defeated in the polls and booted out of parliament and reduced to only 2 MLAs.
How a women's studies instructor can opine about hydro is beyond imagination. I suppose Hydro is male dominated and that is why it needs renewable IPP power!
One of the legacies of Marjorie Cohen is that BC Hydro did not spend on infrastructure upgrade and maintenance so as not to expose its bloated organization, and now its infrastructure is crumbling. Thanks to women's studied instructor mooching on taxpayer's money.
Where is Rafe Mair?
Mr. Mair, your credibility and your untruths are being questioned here at the Boundary Sentinel.
Where are you hiding Mr. mair, and why have you turned off commenting at your own blog the Common Sense Canadian?
Do you have the courage to withstand scrutiny or are you hiding the coward that you are?
Mair: "This article
Mair: "This article originally appeared in the Common Sense Canadian."
Except that the comment board at Common Sense Canadian is closed to the critique of Mair's nonsense. If you try to leave a comment there, it will be deleted and after a few tries your IP will be blocked.
This is a fascistic organization that acts like a rightwing authoritarian society complete with a Goebbles-like film making propaganda arm.
So much for "common sense".
Refuting the nonsense of Rafe Mair
Mair says: "The Campbell/Clark government has forced, and continues to force BC Hydro to buy power from Independent Power Producers (IPPS) on a “take or pay” basis, meaning Hydro is spilling its reservoirs over their dams and paying several times the market value to IPPs. Literally, Hydro is spilling your Hydro rates over the dam in order to meet the “sweetheart” deals the Campbell/Clark government has forced them to sign.
1- Hydro very occasionally spills its reservoirs. In 2012, due to a 170% above average snowbase, some of BC Hydro's 31 dams, those located in the Columbia Basin have spilled. But in the past 11 years, BC Hydro was a net importer of power because of insufficient power generation. Most of BC Hydro's dams have not spilled in 2012. Mair wants BC Hydro to plan a 60 year power program based on one year's extraordinary snowcap. That is not how it is done in this industry.
2- No, IPP power is LESS than market value and NOT several times. Dirty (coal and nuclear) and nonfirm spot Washington power has cost 4.4 cents in the past 5 years on the average. Add to that the cost to green it, clean it, make it firm and long-term (BC Hydro cannot plan on spot power), and then add liquidated damages, then the cost increases to 7.7 cents. This does not include the cost of mercury emissions, particuates, radioactive waste, tailings, acid rains, etc. which should be added. Mr. Mair wants all our capital to be exported to Washington to buy dirty GHG spewing power, and show nothing for it. IPP power costs 6.8 cents and BC Hydro gets to own the plant after the end of term.
3- Sweetheart deals? You mean 69 projects applying for 21 contracts in a public tender where the ONLY buyer is BC Hydro (there is no other buyer of IPP power) is not competitive enough for Mair? Then why is it that 50% to 70% of these projects never get built due to economic infeasibility?
Mr. Mair - show us your numbers and references and not simplistic rhetoric and cheap polemics.
Rafe Mair - the master of counter-factuality
Mair: "avoid the issue of BC Hydro rates rising because of the scandalous sums they are forced to pay private power companies"
Any numbers or refereneces Mr. Mair to prove your statement?
You have been asked this question countless number of times -- but not once are you able to backup your innuendos.
Take a look at BC Hydro's report on the last (2008) power tender:
http://bit.ly/9UF9N0
You will see that the few IPP projects that received a contract due for 2016 averaged 10.1 cents a kWh.
Then subtract property taxes, first nation royalties, land tenure fee, income taxes, water rental fee, construction taxes and dividend taxes which add up to about 4 cents a kWh, none of which BC Hydro has to pay (except water rental for 0.6 cents), and you get the average IPP price of 6.1 cents. Then add another 0.7 cents the cost to BC Hydro to purchase the IPP plant at the end of the term, and the true cost of IPP power is 6.8 cents which is below residential power rates in BC.
Compare that to Site C which is 11.8 cents and an environmental catastrophe.
So Mr. Mair you are an ignorant and ideological wart with no knowledge of the facts on the ground. Are you not?
Numbers please Mr. Mair -- numbers and citations -- provide backup to your simplistic claims. You are challenged Mr. Mair.
IPPs are important
There are so many important energy innovations at risk because of this NDP argument of private / public ownership. Moreover, BC Hydro has never wanted to purchase independent power. It interferes with their revenue priorities.
Amazingly, this organization fabricated a grassroots environmental campaign that distinguishes BC from the rest of the planet when it comes to identifying what green energy actually is.
For 30 or 40 years BC has debt-financed megaprojects and now we are asked to believe that marginal new production bankrupts BC Hydro.
Will any electrical production be possible in BC if it is not a megaproject?
We are sacrificing geothermal sources. Will independent power be not allowed to market in Rafe's world?
Remote communities and mining operations could benefit. There was a report two days ago from CANGEA that McGill researchers are designing heat exchange systems - by flooding old mine workings - capable of producing upto 150MW of power AFTER workings are abandoned.
Kootenay media deserves fish-heads for the one sided stories on IPPs. They have made themselves indistinguishable from the campaigners themselves.
There are existing small-scale IPP's in the Kootenays - have any news outlets ever interviewed them? Contract renewals are coming up soon with BC hydro for the power contracts. Will more local jobs be lost?
What about Slocan City where the mill can remain viable - in converting to a biofuel facility - but Fortis doesn't have an extra 3megawatt to rum it. NO go unless Slocan does a micro-hydro facility...
And so on.... but details are lost on mobs responding simply to ideology.
Nonsense, untruths, and counterfactual claims by Mair
BC Hydro’s cost of power generation is almost twice that of private hydro power producers.
BC Hydro's report on the latest (2008) power call says:
Private run of river hydro power costs 4 cents a kWh (older plants) to 6.8 cents (newer plants) after taxes, royalties and fees paid to the government.
http://bit.ly/9UF9N0
On the other hand BC Hydro's own plants cost:
BC Hydro Aberfeldie run of river: 13.5 cents a kWh (existing)
BC Hydro Site C: 11.8 cents (future)
BC Hydro John Hart run of river: 12.5 cents. (future)
(BC Hydro pays only 0.2 cents of taxes to government – only 1/20 of what private power pays)
Private power hydro costs about half of BC Hydro’s new plants. This is due to the competitiveness of IPP power versus very high costs for BC Hydro operations and construction due to public union control of contracts and cash flow, high above market salaries, high benefits, and bonuses paid even at a loss.
In a very competitive tender, only one out of four private projects gets an Electricity Purchase Agreement from BC Hydro. Prices are slashed to the bare bones because BC Hydro is the only buyer of power in BC. BC Hydro is the most overstaffed and inefficient of all crown corporations, where everything is gold plated at ratepayer's expense, and no one takes any risk or can be dismissed for incompetence.
The private power purchase contracts can be found here in detail:
http://bit.ly/JSGFdj
Microsoft Word format