Poll

COMMENT: Our crumbling infrastructure

Alex Atamanenko
By Alex Atamanenko
October 10th, 2012

Stories about crumbling public infrastructure are being reported right across the country.  As the federal government continues to download more of its responsibilities onto the provinces, and the provinces onto municipalities, it is inevitable that the next generation will be the ones forced to foot the growing bills. This is not only unnecessary but addressing the problem would help bolster our sluggish economy and be a smart investment in our communities.

This opinion was echoed recently as the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) released their first ever Canadian Infrastructure Report Card. They argue that crumbling infrastructure and events like sinkholes or concrete falling from bridges are not ‘freak accidents’ but are symptoms of overburdened municipalities who need the federal government to commit to adequate infrastructure funding that will tackle deteriorating roads and water systems.

The infrastructure called for is the basic nuts and bolts of our communities and to barge ahead without addressing the growing deficiency makes little sense. The previous round of stimulus spending focused on smaller ‘shovel-ready’ projects which were politically expedient, but didn’t address many real infrastructure challenges. Additionally, the premium placed on projects that could easily be completed gave larger communities an upper hand in the process. Cities that employ engineers were able to meet the narrow timeline but many rural and northern communities were hobbled from the start.

While that stimulus spending did some infrastructure work, what remains is a problem that has basic safety at its heart. The FCM tells us 21% of our roads are in poor condition. Their report card shows more than 200 communities across the country suffer from water quality problems and over half of those have boil water advisories in place.

For remote and smaller communities waiting to begin repairs to crumbling roads, water and sewer systems, the burden is much more acute as distance and smaller populations come into play. The need for leadership is clear and the federal government is the most suited to provide it.

Ultimately, a round of stimulus funding focused on infrastructure would create jobs and help ease the growing burden placed on municipalities from years of downloaded costs. A commitment to adequate, predictable, long-term funding for our municipalities would send a signal that Canada is planning for a prosperous future and making the investment needed to ensure that flows to all regions.

Alex Atamanenko is the MP for BC Southern Interior.

This post was syndicated from https://rosslandtelegraph.com
Categories: Op/EdPolitics

Comments

11°C Overcast Clouds

Other News Stories

Opinion